QA & test automation
A suite you trust enough to deploy on — not one people re-run until it happens to go green.
A flaky test suite is worse than no suite. It costs the same to run, it trains everyone to hit retry, and it hides the failure that was real. Testing work usually has to start with fixing trust, not adding coverage.
We build end-to-end coverage on the handful of journeys that actually matter — sign up, pay, the core loop — and keep it fast enough to gate every pull request. Below that sits the unit and integration layer, where most assertions belong and where they cost least to run.
Flake gets a policy rather than a shrug: quarantined immediately, tracked with an owner, fixed or deleted within a fortnight. And test data gets designed, because most end-to-end suites are unreliable for the boring reason that they share mutable state.
What you get
- End-to-end suite on the journeys that would cost you money if they broke
- Flake quarantine policy with owners and a fortnight deadline
- Test data strategy and disposable environments per run
- PR gates with an agreed runtime budget, plus a fuller nightly suite
Common questions
Can you add tests to a codebase written without them?
Do you do manual and exploratory QA?
Our suite is flaky and nobody trusts it. Is that fixable?
Next step
Tell us what has to ship, and by when.
One call, no deck. If we are not the right team for it we will say so, and usually point you at who is.
Typical reply within one business day · CET / CEST (UTC+1 / UTC+2)