Start a conversation

Web platforms

Product web applications and the platforms behind them — fast, accessible, and still maintainable when the team doubles.

  • TypeScript
  • React
  • Next.js
  • Astro
  • Vue
  • Node
  • Postgres
  • Playwright

A web application is easy to start and expensive to keep. We build the version that stays cheap: a component layer your designers recognise, state that lives in one obvious place, and performance treated as a budget rather than a clean-up task for later.

We work in TypeScript across the stack, and we pick the rendering model to fit the product rather than the fashion — server-rendered where the content has to be indexed and fast on a cold visit, a client application where the interaction genuinely warrants it, and often both in the same codebase.

Accessibility and performance are written into the definition of done, not audited afterwards. That means keyboard paths and screen-reader semantics reviewed in the same pull request as the feature, and a page-weight budget that fails the build when it is exceeded. Retrofitting either one costs several times what it costs to do inline.

What you get

  • A component library or design system your team can extend without asking us
  • Server-rendered or client application with enforced performance budgets
  • Auth, roles, billing and the other plumbing every product needs and nobody scopes
  • Accessibility to WCAG 2.2 AA, verified with real assistive technology

Common questions

Can you work with our designers rather than replacing them?
That is the normal case. We take Figma files and turn them into a component layer, and we push back in the file rather than silently reinterpreting it in code. If you have no designer we can work from wireframes, but we will be honest that we are engineers, not a brand studio.
Can you take over a codebase someone else wrote?
Yes — taking over an existing codebase is normal work for us. The first week is a read and a written assessment: what is sound, what is load-bearing and undocumented, what we would change first. You get that document whether or not you continue with us.
Do you do a rewrite or improve what exists?
Almost always the second. A rewrite hides a year of accumulated business logic in a codebase nobody reads any more, and the new version reaches feature parity later than anyone forecasts. We will recommend one only when the current stack blocks something you actually need.

Next step

Tell us what has to ship, and by when.

One call, no deck. If we are not the right team for it we will say so, and usually point you at who is.

Start a conversation branislav@thrivee.io

Typical reply within one business day · CET / CEST (UTC+1 / UTC+2)